The 2024/2025 Premier League season did not erase home advantage, but it produced a handful of teams whose away results outstripped both historical expectations and public perception. Liverpool, Arsenal and Nottingham Forest stand out as travelling sides whose records on the road either matched or exceeded their reputations, while clubs like Bournemouth and Crystal Palace delivered steadier away returns than their league positions alone suggest. For serious bettors, identifying these overperforming away profiles is essential to knowing when taking the plus side of the handicap with them as visitors is more rational than instinctively leaning toward hosts.
Why it is logical to search for “good away teams” in handicap markets
Away teams still win fewer Premier League matches than home sides, but the gap has narrowed. Long‑run analysis shows home teams winning about 40% of games and away teams about 32%, with away goals only fractionally lower than home goals (1.47 vs 1.51 per match), which is far closer than many fans assume. That shrinkage means some well‑organised travellers can consistently match or beat market expectations on the road, especially when pricing still bakes in older, stronger home‑advantage assumptions.
Handicap lines reflect the intersection of absolute team quality and contextual factors like venue, fatigue and injuries. If an away side has a proven ability to control games, limit xG against, or create efficient counter‑attacks on the road, the “true” spread might be narrower than the headline reputation gap suggests. In those cases, holding the away +0.5 or +0.75 line, or even backing a small away favourite at 0 or -0.25, can be a structured way to exploit under‑rated travelling strength.
The 2024/2025 away table: who actually overperformed on the road?
Away‑only tables for 2024/2025 show a clear top tier of travelling teams. Liverpool posted the league’s best away record, going 11‑5‑3 across 19 road matches, scoring 44 goals and conceding 25 for 38 away points and an average of 2.00 points per game. Arsenal followed with a 9‑8‑2 away record, 34 goals for and 17 against, yielding 35 points and 1.84 points per away game. Nottingham Forest completed the top three away performers by points, recording 10 wins, three draws and six losses on their travels, with a 32:30 goal record and 33 points (1.74 per game).
Behind this leading trio, Manchester City and Brighton each collected 29 away points (8‑5‑6) with positive away goal differences, while Bournemouth, Chelsea, Fulham, Crystal Palace and Newcastle clustered at 28 away points with balanced or slightly positive goals for and against. These totals stand out when compared to the league’s bottom travellers: Leicester (10 points, 18:46 goals), Ipswich (15 points, 22:38) and Southampton (6 points, 13:39) performed far below the away standard. The presence of Forest, Bournemouth, Fulham and Palace in the mid‑to‑high away‑points band is the “unexpected” layer that matters most for handicap thinking.
How Liverpool, Arsenal and Forest constructed strong away records
Liverpool’s away strength in 2024/2025 reflects elite attacking power combined with adequate defensive control. Their 44 away goals were the highest in the league, and an 11‑5‑3 road record mirrors their overall title push, indicating that they did not rely solely on Anfield to rack up points. In handicap terms, that means Liverpool -0.5 or -0.75 away from home against mid‑table opposition often rested on a genuine expectation of superiority, not just brand weight.
Arsenal’s 9‑8‑2 away record with only 17 goals conceded shows a different pattern: fewer outright wins than Liverpool but exceptional defensive away solidity. Eight draws indicate many tight matches where Arsenal controlled xG but either failed to convert or were content to manage risk, which is relevant for whether you prefer backing them as small favourites or taking more cautious DNB/0 lines. Nottingham Forest’s 10 away wins, by contrast, are the obvious surprise: a team outside the traditional elite capturing more away victories than many bigger clubs. That tally points to a game model—often compact, counter‑attacking and set‑piece focused—that translated better on the road than at the City Ground.
Comparing expected and “surprising” away overperformers
From a betting perspective, Liverpool and Arsenal being strong away is not shocking; the surprise is how dominant their road results were and how consistently they translated quality into away points. Forest, Bournemouth, Fulham, Crystal Palace and Newcastle are more interesting: their away points totals (28–33) and roughly balanced goal differences outperform what many casual bettors would expect from mid‑table or lower‑mid‑table sides. When sportsbooks price these clubs heavily as underdogs purely on name value and venue, serious bettors can question whether the spread truly reflects current 2024/2025 away strength.
How a bettor using UFABET can hold away handicaps intelligently
When you evaluate a match where a “quietly strong” away team visits a more famous but inconsistent host, the handicap line becomes a useful filter. If data shows that Bournemouth or Fulham have collected close to 1.5 points per game away from home with solid defensive numbers, while the host has an average home record, an away +0.5 or +0.75 position may carry more substance than public sentiment suggests. Executing that idea through a web‑based service such as ยูฟ่าเบท168 becomes more disciplined when you can point to specific away‑table evidence—points per game, away goal difference, and style that travels—rather than simply reacting to pre‑match narratives about “tough grounds”; this shift from badge‑driven to data‑driven away support is exactly the kind of edge serious bettors aim to cultivate.
Why certain styles travel better than others in 2024/2025
Underlying style explains why some teams exceed expectations on the road. Sides built on organised defending, quick counters and set‑pieces—Forest, Bournemouth, sometimes Brentford—often find their approach more effective away from home, where opponents feel obliged to attack more and leave space. Their lack of creative burden reduces the downside of ceding possession; the game script naturally invites the kind of transition chances they are designed to exploit.
Conversely, teams whose home success relies on high pressing and complex positional play can find away matches more variable, especially when crowd effects favour the host’s energy and refereeing subtly shifts marginal calls. In 2024/2025, xG‑based playing‑style analysis shows that some mid‑table teams have better defensive xG and counter‑attack metrics away than at home, indicating that they are structurally more comfortable in reactive roles. Recognising which sides fall into this “travels well” category helps you distinguish live away underdogs from those likely to fold once pressure mounts.
Using a structured list to decide when away +handicap makes sense
Because away support goes against the intuitive comfort of backing home sides, a simple checklist can ground your decisions. Before taking an away team on the handicap, especially in 2024/2025, you can run through a set of questions that tie directly to away performance data and current conditions rather than narrative.
For each potential away handicap bet, consider:
- Away points and margins: Does this team average at least 1.3–1.4 points per away game, with a small or positive away goal difference, indicating resilience as visitors?
- Host’s home strength: Is the home side genuinely dominant at their ground, or are they closer to league average in home points and goal difference, suggesting the venue edge is modest?
- Style alignment: Does the away team’s typical strategy (compact block, counters, set‑pieces) exploit weaknesses in the host’s style, particularly if the host struggles against direct attacks or aerial threat?
- Squad and schedule: Are there no major injury clusters or severe fatigue factors (post‑Europe, heavy rotation) that might degrade the away side’s defensive organisation or running intensity on the day?
Thinking through these points slows any reflex to simply oppose away sides, and instead frames the handicap as a function of concrete away performance and matchup fit. When several boxes align in favour of the traveller, taking +0.5 or +0.75 becomes a reasoned position rather than a gamble against the crowd.
Away‑focused comparison table for 2024/2025
A compact table helps visualise which clubs actually belong in the “away overperformer” conversation and how you might treat them in handicaps.
| Away profile tier (2024/2025) | Example teams (away table) | Typical betting angle when they are away |
| Elite away performers | Liverpool (38 pts, 44:25), Arsenal (35 pts, 34:17), Forest (33 pts, 32:30) | Can justify small away favourites or 0 lines vs weak hosts |
| Solid, under‑rated travellers | Brighton, Bournemouth, Chelsea, Fulham, Palace, Newcastle (28–29 pts) | Attractive on +0.25 to +0.75 vs average home teams |
| Weak away sides | Leicester, Ipswich, Southampton (≤15 pts, heavy GA) | Only support at big prices or strong +handicaps |
Interpreting this table, rather than memorising every number, keeps your away‑bet thinking anchored to actual road performance. You can still fade elite travellers when spots are bad—injuries, fatigue, elite hosts—but you avoid automatically dismissing teams like Forest, Bournemouth or Fulham when data says their 2024/2025 away body of work deserves more respect.
Where the “good away team” angle can fail
Despite strong seasonal away records, several failure points limit how far you can push this angle. First, sample size: 19 away matches are enough to show tendencies, but not enough to eliminate variance; a few late winners or goalkeeping hot streaks can flatten deeper issues that will unwind in future games. Second, markets adapt: once Liverpool’s or Arsenal’s away strength becomes widely recognised, prices tighten, and the edge moves from blindly backing them to selectively choosing spots where the line is still a touch short.
Third, context shifts with injuries, tactical tweaks and managerial changes. A travelling side that looked stable early in the season can become fragile after losing a key midfielder or switching to a more open system, changing how reliable their previous away numbers are as a guide. Finally, specific away venues still matter: some grounds involve more travel, weather and stylistic discomfort than others, affecting both performance and the psychological confidence of visiting sides. Treating the away angle as conditional rather than universal keeps it in its proper place—as one structured factor among many in pre‑match analysis.
Summary
The 2024/2025 Premier League away table reveals more nuance than a simple “home strong, away weak” story, with Liverpool, Arsenal and Nottingham Forest establishing genuinely impressive road records and a pack of mid‑table clubs—Brighton, Bournemouth, Fulham, Crystal Palace, Newcastle—performing better away from home than many reputations imply. Because overall home advantage has shrunk and away goals nearly match home goals, those travelling strengths matter directly for handicaps: in the right matchup, holding the away side +0.5, +0.75 or even at 0 can be grounded in data rather than contrarian instinct. The most effective use of this angle comes from combining away‑table evidence with style, squad and scheduling context, turning raw road records into a targeted part of your decision about when those underrated visitors actually deserve your support on the spread.
About the Author
